Trending
News

Al Jazeera Apologised Privately to Me Over Mehdi Hasan Interview — Bwala

Presidential aide Daniel Bwala revealed he is suing Al Jazeera for defamation in England after the network privately apologized for failing to disclose their interview talking points during his tense March 2026 clash with Mehdi Hasan, but refused to make the apology public or address his claims of heavily biased editing.

Daniel Momodu · · 222
Al Jazeera Apologised Privately to Me Over Mehdi Hasan Interview — Bwala

Nigerian presidential aide Daniel Bwala has claimed that Al Jazeera privately apologized to him following his widely criticized appearance on the network’s Head to Head program hosted by Mehdi Hasan. Bwala, who serves as the Special Adviser on Media and Policy Communication to President Bola Tinubu, stated that the international broadcaster acknowledged an ethical slip but refused his demands to make the apology public. Because of this refusal, Bwala revealed he has instructed his legal team in England to file a defamation lawsuit against the network in British courts.


Bwala shared these updates during an interview on Morayo Afolabi-Brown's show, months after his March 2026 appearance on Al Jazeera. The broadcast had gone viral after Mehdi Hasan intensely grilled Bwala, playing back past video clips and quoting tweets where Bwala, then an opposition spokesperson supporting Atiku Abubakar, had fiercely criticized Tinubu's integrity and policies. According to Bwala, the private apology from Al Jazeera focused on a breach of prior agreements, specifically their failure to disclose that part of the interview would interrogate his personal political consistency and past statements. When Bwala requested that the network post the apology on social media, he claims they declined, stating it would damage the credibility of the network and its other program producers.


Bwala further accused Al Jazeera of heavily editing the Head to Head episode to manipulate public perception, noting that the original recording lasted an hour and a half but was cut down to a 49-minute broadcast that favored Hasan. He alleged that the network cut out segments where he successfully fact-checked the host and received audience applause, while intentionally leaving in portions where he appeared to flatly deny his own past quotes. He also claimed they removed an opening remark where he stated he would deny answering questions regarding his past if the interview drifted from the pre-agreed topics of economy, security, and governance. Because the broadcaster chose to protect its brand rather than issue a public correction, Bwala maintained that legal action is his only recourse to address what his lawyers term as actionable defamation.


Share this story

Comments (0)

  1. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Leave a comment

All comments are moderated before publishing. Your email is never published.

Not published.

Related stories