Aburi Accord: Ojukwu Frustrated All Peace Moves — Gowon
Aburi Accord: Ojukwu Frustrated All Peace Moves — Gowon
Former Head of State Yakubu Gowon has reopened one of the most sensitive chapters in Nigeria’s history, accusing late Biafran leader Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu of frustrating repeated efforts to prevent the Nigerian Civil War.
Gowon made the claims in his autobiography, My Life of Service and Allegiance, where he reflected on the political crisis, failed peace negotiations, and growing mistrust that eventually pushed Nigeria into the 1967–1970 Civil War.
According to Gowon, several attempts were made by the federal military government to peacefully resolve the crisis that followed the January and July 1966 coups and the killings of Igbos in parts of Northern Nigeria.
He stated that the federal government attended the January 1967 peace meeting in Aburi, Ghana, with genuine intentions to preserve Nigeria’s unity through dialogue and reconciliation.
The meeting, brokered by former Ghanaian leader Joseph Arthur Ankrah, brought together Nigeria’s top military officers at a time ethnic tensions and political instability had already pushed the country close to collapse.
However, Gowon claimed the talks later broke down because both sides returned from Ghana with conflicting interpretations of the agreement reached during the discussions.
According to him, Ojukwu’s interpretation of the Aburi Accord would have drastically weakened the authority of the Federal Government and left Nigeria too fragile to survive as one nation.
“What was presented by Ojukwu as the Aburi Accord was, in reality, his own interpretation of our discussions,” Gowon wrote.
The former military ruler insisted that despite growing tension, the federal government continued making efforts to avoid war and preserve national unity.
“At every stage, we tried to preserve Nigeria without resorting to war,” he stated.
Gowon also defended the creation of 12 states shortly before Biafra’s declaration in 1967, saying the decision was aimed at protecting minority ethnic groups who feared domination within the regions.
He rejected claims that the federal government sought war, insisting that military confrontation became unavoidable only after Biafra declared secession on May 30, 1967.
“Ojukwu’s declaration of Biafra left the federal government with no choice,” he wrote.
Reflecting on the end of the war in 1970, Gowon defended the “No Victor, No Vanquished” policy, stressing that the conflict was fought to preserve Nigeria’s unity rather than punish any ethnic group.
“We fought to keep Nigeria one, not to destroy a people,” he stated.
Related stories
News
Ten Nations Eye 2030 FIFA World Cup Return
FIFA has identified 10 countries, including Nigeria, Italy, Ghana, Algeria and Belgium, as strong contenders to make a successful return at the 2030 FIFA World Cup after missing out on recent tournaments or underperforming in previous editions.
News
Infantino Set for Fourth FIFA Term Despite World Cup Controversies
Gianni Infantino is expected to win a fourth term as FIFA president after securing overwhelming support from FIFA member associations, despite criticism over governance issues and controversies surrounding the 2026 FIFA World Cup.
News
La Liga President Calls on FIFA's Infantino to Resign
La Liga President Javier Tebas has urged FIFA President Gianni Infantino to resign, accusing him of harming football through controversial tournament expansion plans and governance decisions that he says prioritise commercial interests over the welfare of the sport.
News
UEFA President Ceferin Boycotts 2026 World Cup Final Amid FIFA Dispute
UEFA President Aleksander Ceferin skipped the 2026 FIFA World Cup final amid a deepening dispute with FIFA President Gianni Infantino over controversial tournament decisions, including disciplinary rulings, governance concerns and proposals to expand the World Cup.
Comments (0)
Leave a comment
All comments are moderated before publishing. Your email is never published.