Aburi Accord: Ojukwu Frustrated All Peace Moves — Gowon
Aburi Accord: Ojukwu Frustrated All Peace Moves — Gowon
Former Head of State Yakubu Gowon has reopened one of the most sensitive chapters in Nigeria’s history, accusing late Biafran leader Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu of frustrating repeated efforts to prevent the Nigerian Civil War.
Gowon made the claims in his autobiography, My Life of Service and Allegiance, where he reflected on the political crisis, failed peace negotiations, and growing mistrust that eventually pushed Nigeria into the 1967–1970 Civil War.
According to Gowon, several attempts were made by the federal military government to peacefully resolve the crisis that followed the January and July 1966 coups and the killings of Igbos in parts of Northern Nigeria.
He stated that the federal government attended the January 1967 peace meeting in Aburi, Ghana, with genuine intentions to preserve Nigeria’s unity through dialogue and reconciliation.
The meeting, brokered by former Ghanaian leader Joseph Arthur Ankrah, brought together Nigeria’s top military officers at a time ethnic tensions and political instability had already pushed the country close to collapse.
However, Gowon claimed the talks later broke down because both sides returned from Ghana with conflicting interpretations of the agreement reached during the discussions.
According to him, Ojukwu’s interpretation of the Aburi Accord would have drastically weakened the authority of the Federal Government and left Nigeria too fragile to survive as one nation.
“What was presented by Ojukwu as the Aburi Accord was, in reality, his own interpretation of our discussions,” Gowon wrote.
The former military ruler insisted that despite growing tension, the federal government continued making efforts to avoid war and preserve national unity.
“At every stage, we tried to preserve Nigeria without resorting to war,” he stated.
Gowon also defended the creation of 12 states shortly before Biafra’s declaration in 1967, saying the decision was aimed at protecting minority ethnic groups who feared domination within the regions.
He rejected claims that the federal government sought war, insisting that military confrontation became unavoidable only after Biafra declared secession on May 30, 1967.
“Ojukwu’s declaration of Biafra left the federal government with no choice,” he wrote.
Reflecting on the end of the war in 1970, Gowon defended the “No Victor, No Vanquished” policy, stressing that the conflict was fought to preserve Nigeria’s unity rather than punish any ethnic group.
“We fought to keep Nigeria one, not to destroy a people,” he stated.
Related stories
News
Atiku Demands Clarity on Tinubu’s Presidential Authority
Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has questioned who is constitutionally exercising presidential authority following President Bola Tinubu’s continued absence from Nigeria beyond the announced 21-day vacation period.
News
NDC Splits Over Competing Plateau Governorship Primary Results
The NDC in Plateau State is divided over competing claims from its recent governorship substitution primary, with the national leadership backing Da Jonathan Sunday Akuns.
News
APC Members, Adelabu Supporters Join APM in Oyo
Thousands of APC members and supporters of former Power Minister Adebayo Adelabu have defected to the APM in Oyo State ahead of the 2027 elections.
News
Five US TV Networks Halt White House Pool Coverage Over Trump Media Ban
ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox and NBC suspended pooled White House television coverage after the Trump administration barred CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House.
Comments (0)
Leave a comment
All comments are moderated before publishing. Your email is never published.