A recent airstrike in Sokoto State has triggered fresh national debate over Nigeria’s sovereignty, security strategy and the role of foreign involvement in counterterrorism operations.
The strike, which targeted suspected armed groups operating in remote areas of the state, has drawn mixed reactions from political leaders and the public. While security authorities say the operation was aimed at neutralising threats to local communities, questions have emerged about intelligence coordination and operational oversight.
Senate President Godswill Akpabio defended the broader security framework, stating that Nigeria must use every lawful means available to confront insurgency and banditry. He emphasised that protecting citizens remains the primary duty of the state and that security collaborations are often necessary in complex conflicts.
However, Senator Abdul Ningi expressed reservations, warning that Nigeria must guard against actions that could undermine its sovereignty or place excessive reliance on external forces. He called for greater transparency in how security operations are planned and executed, especially when they have cross border or international dimensions.
Security analysts note that Nigeria’s fight against insurgent and criminal networks increasingly involves intelligence sharing and logistical support from international partners. While such cooperation can improve effectiveness, it also raises concerns about accountability and national control.
Communities in affected areas have urged authorities to prioritise civilian safety and ensure that operations do not unintentionally harm innocent residents. Human rights advocates are also calling for thorough investigations into any reports of collateral damage.
The debate highlights the delicate balance Nigeria faces between strengthening security capacity and maintaining full sovereign control over its territory and decision making. Lawmakers are expected to push for further briefings from defence and security chiefs in the coming weeks.
Observers say the controversy could lead to renewed legislative scrutiny of military operations and foreign security partnerships, as the country continues to grapple with persistent insecurity.
