The House of Representatives has summoned the Auditor General of the Federation along with key government ministers to explain alleged irregularities in the management of funds allocated to the agriculture sector.
Lawmakers say the move follows concerns raised in recent audit reports indicating gaps in accountability, delayed project execution, and unclear expenditure records tied to agricultural intervention programs. The funds in question were reportedly meant to boost food production, support farmers, and improve rural livelihoods.
Members of the House Committee handling the probe expressed worry that despite large budgetary allocations over the years, food prices remain high and local production has not improved at the expected rate. They said this disconnect raises questions about how effectively the funds were used.
The summoned officials are expected to provide detailed breakdowns of disbursements, project locations, contractors involved, and measurable outcomes. Lawmakers also want clarification on why some projects listed in official records appear either incomplete or non existent in the communities they were supposed to benefit.
Agriculture has been a central focus of government policy, especially amid rising concerns over food insecurity and inflation. Several intervention schemes have targeted fertilizer subsidies, irrigation projects, mechanization, and farmer financing.
Civil society groups have long argued that weak monitoring systems allow leakages in agricultural spending. They say smallholder farmers, who form the backbone of local food production, often struggle to access the support meant for them.
The House warned that any official found to have mismanaged or diverted public funds would face consequences in line with the law. Lawmakers stressed that accountability in agriculture spending is directly tied to national food security.
Officials from the agriculture ministry have previously defended their programs, saying factors such as insecurity, climate challenges, and global supply disruptions also affect outcomes.
The investigation is expected to continue in the coming weeks, with the House promising to make its findings public. Observers say the probe could shape future reforms in how agricultural interventions are planned, monitored, and evaluated.
