Operatives of the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) on Wednesday took former Kaduna State governor, Nasir El-Rufai, into custody shortly after proceedings at the Federal High Court in Kaduna.
El-Rufai, who is currently facing trial over alleged corruption, had just concluded a hearing on his bail application when security operatives escorted him into a waiting vehicle. He was subsequently driven away, with reports indicating he was being transported to Abuja.
Prior to the court session, there was a noticeable buildup of security personnel around the premises, fueling speculation that the former governor might be detained following the hearing. El-Rufai arrived at the court at about 9:05 a.m. in a Hilux van, drawing significant attention from both security officials and observers present at the venue.
Speaking to journalists after the proceedings, lead defence counsel, Oluwole Iyamu (SAN), confirmed that the court had reserved ruling on the bail application until April 14. According to him, both the defence and prosecution had fully argued their positions before the court.
“The bail application was argued and responded to, and the ruling has been fixed for April 14. We look forward to that day and remain hopeful,” Iyamu stated, expressing confidence in the judicial process.
He further disclosed that the legal team is also preparing for a separate case involving El-Rufai, scheduled for April 10 at the Federal High Court in Abuja. Iyamu clarified that the upcoming matter is distinct from the current proceedings, noting that all necessary legal processes have been filed.
The latest development follows an earlier adjournment on Tuesday, during which proceedings were briefly complicated by a motion requesting the presiding judge, Rilwan M. Aikawa, to recuse himself. However, the motion was later withdrawn, allowing the case to proceed without further delay.
El-Rufai had previously been arraigned before the Kaduna State High Court in Kawo alongside Amadu Sule on separate charges, including abuse of office, fraud, and conferring undue advantage. Those charges remain distinct from the case currently before the Federal High Court.
The case continues to draw significant public attention as legal proceedings unfold.
