Fresh political tensions have emerged following claims by former Kaduna State Governor Nasir El Rufai that his phone conversations were being monitored on the orders of the National Security Adviser NSA. The allegation has triggered swift reactions from the Presidency and political allies who have dismissed the assertion and warned against what they describe as unsubstantiated claims capable of inflaming public distrust.
El Rufai had alleged during a media interaction that his communications were being tracked due to his outspoken political stance. He suggested that such actions, if true, would represent an abuse of national security infrastructure. His remarks immediately drew public attention, prompting debates over surveillance, privacy rights, and executive oversight.
In response, senior government figures rejected the accusation, stating that national security institutions operate within established legal frameworks. Presidency sources insisted that surveillance activities, where necessary, are guided by due process and national interest, not partisan rivalry. They cautioned political actors against making allegations that could undermine confidence in security agencies.
Allies of the administration have reportedly intensified efforts to clarify the issue, describing the claim as politically motivated. Some have argued that intelligence agencies are primarily focused on combating terrorism, banditry, and cybercrime rather than monitoring political opponents.
Legal experts say the controversy underscores the need for transparent oversight mechanisms governing surveillance powers. Nigeria security laws permit targeted monitoring under defined circumstances, but such actions are typically subject to judicial authorization and internal review.
Civil society groups have called for calm, urging both parties to present verifiable evidence before drawing conclusions. They warn that politicizing security matters could distract from pressing national challenges.
As the debate unfolds, observers note that the issue reflects deeper tensions within the political class ahead of the 2027 electoral cycle. Analysts believe that allegations involving national security institutions are likely to remain sensitive, particularly in a climate of heightened political maneuvering.
The Presidency has not announced any formal investigation into the claim, but insiders suggest discussions are ongoing within relevant agencies. For now, the controversy continues to fuel public discourse on governance, accountability, and the balance between security and civil liberties in Nigeria.
