A United States Congressman, Bill Huizenga, has stated that while President Donald Trump’s recent remarks on possible military intervention in Nigeria are concerning, the U.S. is more likely to adopt targeted economic sanctions rather than launch any form of military action.
Huizenga made this known in an interview with Arise Television, explaining that sanctions would be a more effective and strategic measure to address the alleged killings of Christians in Nigeria. According to him, the goal is to “cut off the flow of money and travel” for individuals and organisations linked to violent attacks.
His statement comes days after President Trump warned that the United States could “very well go in, guns-a-blazing” if the Nigerian government fails to protect Christian communities. Trump also threatened to halt foreign aid to Nigeria, describing the situation as “a genocide against Christians.”
However, Huizenga clarified that he does not foresee an actual U.S. military strike, noting that diplomatic and economic measures are preferred at this stage.
The Nigerian government has strongly rejected the idea of external military intervention, insisting that there is no state-backed religious persecution in the country. It described the U.S. President’s comments as “misinformed and dangerous.”
Several U.S. lawmakers, including Representatives Gregory Meeks and Sara Jacobs, have also criticised Trump’s rhetoric, calling it “reckless and irresponsible.”
Analysts believe the growing tension could strain U.S.–Nigeria relations, with potential implications for trade, security cooperation, and diplomacy if Washington proceeds
