Concerns have emerged over the scheduling of Nigeria’s 2027 presidential and National Assembly elections for February 20, as the date may coincide with the Muslim holy month of Ramadan and the Christian Lenten fasting period. However, religious leaders and legal experts argue that religion does not provide a legal or constitutional basis for shifting election dates.
The Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) has dismissed claims that Lent could hinder Christian participation in elections. Daniel Atori, media aide to the Niger State CAN chairman, said Christians have consistently voted during fasting periods. He cited elections in 1999, 2019, and 2023, all of which held during Lent, stressing that Christians remained committed to their civic responsibilities. According to him, fasting does not prevent participation in governance, and he urged the electoral body to be guided strictly by constitutional provisions rather than religious sentiments.
On the Islamic perspective, cleric Ibrahim El Mu’azzam stated that voting during Ramadan is not religiously prohibited. However, he acknowledged that fasting may pose practical challenges, such as reduced energy levels for voters and election officials during the day. He maintained that any impact on turnout would likely be minimal and not deliberate, encouraging Muslims to vote regardless of timing. He also advised the electoral body to consult relevant religious stakeholders to promote inclusiveness.
From a legal standpoint, Barrister Usman Yau explained that under the Electoral Act 2022, religion is not listed as a valid reason for postponing elections. He noted that only circumstances such as insecurity, natural disasters, or public emergencies justify such actions. He emphasized that the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has constitutional independence to fix election dates and has acted within the law.
Public opinion remains divided, with some Nigerians describing the timing as insensitive, while others insist that Nigeria’s secular status makes religion an insufficient basis for altering election schedules. In response to the concerns, INEC has acknowledged public reactions and assured Nigerians that consultations are ongoing. The commission reaffirmed its commitment to transparency, inclusivity, and credible elections, noting that any adjustment would remain within constitutional and legal limits.
